sci.bio.evolution

• Date Index

• Some Questions., gools162
• Re: Overpopulation-Major Catastrophe or Human Control, Guy A Hoelzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Overpopulation-Major Catastrophe or Human Control, Guy A Hoelzer
  • Re: Overpopulation-Major Catastrophe or Human Control, John Edser
• Re: Human Brain Growth, Tim Tyler
• Article: Human genome more variable than previously thought, Robert Karl Stonjek
• The Emperors New Clothes 2006 (with apologies to Hans Christian Anderson), John Edser
• UV to bubbles to photosynthesis precursor?, TomHendricks474
• When did human races split?, lauriecurtispj
  • Re: When did human races split?, lauriecurtispj
    • Re: When did human races split?, Per Rønne
  • Re: When did human races split?, //// Owen \\\\\\\\
    • Re: When did human races split?, Bob Kolker
    • Re: When did human races split?, Malcolm
      • Re: When did human races split?, Bob Kolker
      • Re: When did human races split?, Per Rønne
    • Re: When did human races split?, Tim Tyler
    • Re: When did human races split?, Per Rønne
  • Re: When did human races split?, Malcolm
  • Re: When did human races split?, Bob Kolker
  • Re: When did human races split?, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: When did human races split?, William Morse
  • Re: When did human races split?, Sinombre
  • Re: When did human races split?, omnisensory
• Copy Number Variation and Beneficial Mutations, br . hessels
• The Cost of Substitution [possible REPOST], Walter ReMine
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution [possible REPOST], Malcolm
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution [possible REPOST], John Edser
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution [possible REPOST], Bob Kolker
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution [possible REPOST], Malcolm
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution [possible REPOST], John Edser
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution [possible REPOST], John Edser
• What is a relative opposite supposition (was: Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
• Humans show major DNA differences, Tim Tyler
  • Re: Humans show major DNA differences, Sinombre
  • Re: Humans show major DNA differences, Guy A Hoelzer
• Pyrite and the OOL, TomHendricks474
  • Re: Pyrite and the OOL, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Pyrite and the OOL, Tim Tyler
    • Re: Pyrite and the OOL, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Pyrite and the OOL, Tim Tyler
      • Re: Pyrite and the OOL, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Pyrite and the OOL, Tom Hendricks
  • Re: Pyrite and the OOL, seemysig
• crossed spinal why?, Andersen
  • Re: crossed spinal why?, drosen0000
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: crossed spinal why?, Tim Tyler
• Article: Origin Of Life - The Search For The First Genetic Material, Robert Karl Stonjek
  • Re: Article: Origin Of Life - The Search For The First Genetic Material, Perplexed in Peoria
• Spam filtering as illustration of natural selection, Anthony Campbell
• Article: Was life on Earth inevitable?, Robert Karl Stonjek
• [Newbie] How do organisms adapt to look like leaves and such?, mike bishop
  • Re: [Newbie] How do organisms adapt to look like leaves and such?, Tim Tyler
  • Re: [Newbie] How do organisms adapt to look like leaves and such?, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: [Newbie] How do organisms adapt to look like leaves and such?, mike bishop
      • Re: [Newbie] How do organisms adapt to look like leaves and such?, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: How do organisms adapt to look like leaves and such?, Jim McGinn
    • Re: How do organisms adapt to look like leaves and such?, mike bishop
• Re: Cellular automata and malignant tumors, Tim Tyler
• RE: multiple phenotypes, John Edser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: multiple phenotypes, William Morse
• Re: Darwinian Language (Long Article), Jim McGinn
  • Re: Darwinian Language (Long Article), Paul Crowley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Darwinian Language (Long Article), Bob Kolker
  • Re: Darwinian Language (Long Article), Jim McGinn
• Re: Robot Evolution, feedbackdroid
  • Re: Robot Evolution, Tim Tyler
    • Re: Robot Evolution, Bob Kolker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Robot Evolution, feedbackdroid
  • Re: Robot Evolution, seemysig
  • Re: Robot Evolution, feedbackdroid
    • Re: Robot Evolution, Tim Tyler
      • Re: Robot Evolution, Bob Kolker
  • Re: Robot Evolution, feedbackdroid
  • Re: Robot Evolution, Tim Tyler
    • Re: Robot Evolution, Bob Kolker
      • Re: Robot Evolution, Tim Tyler
    • Re: Robot Evolution, feedbackdroid
      • Re: Robot Evolution, Tim Tyler
• Re: What Use is Religion, Anthony Campbell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What Use is Religion, Bob Kolker
  • Re: What Use is Religion, OlegP
  • Re: What Use is Religion, Malcolm
  • Re: What Use is Religion, Tim Tyler
    • Re: What Use is Religion, dkomo
      • Re: What Use is Religion, Tim Tyler
  • Re: What Use is Religion, Bob Kolker
  • Re: What Use is Religion, Glen M. Sizemore
  • Re: What Use is Religion, Tim Tyler
  • Re: What Use is Religion, John Edser
• Re: BOW WOW, Bob Kolker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: BOW WOW, dkomo
    • Re: BOW WOW, Perplexed in Peoria
• The Cost of Substitution, Walter ReMine
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Malcolm
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Joe Felsenstein
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Walter ReMine
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Tim Tyler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Ron O
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Walter ReMine
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Ron O
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Walter ReMine
      • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Joe Felsenstein
      • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Guy A Hoelzer
      • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
    • Re: The Cost of Substitution, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
  • Re: The Cost of Substitution, John Edser
• Article: Milky Way Shaped Life On Earth, Robert Karl Stonjek
• 3 Separate Scenarios of Behavior = One (Resend), TomHendricks474
• Evolutionary Psychology and Business, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Re: Even "relative" can be relative, John Edser
• Human Chromosome Two: Evidence of First-degree Consanguity in Human Evolution, drjamielove
  • Re: Human Chromosome Two: Evidence of First-degree Consanguity in Human Evolution, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Human Chromosome Two: Evidence of First-degree Consanguity in Human Evolution, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Do Chromosome Fusions = Reproductive Barrier?, drosen0000
  • Different types of aneuploidy, drosen0000
• Ethics of Genetic Engineering, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Ethics of Genetic Engineering, Bob Kolker
    • Re: Ethics of Genetic Engineering, Perplexed in Peoria
• The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • Re: The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans, Bob Kolker
  • Re: The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
    • Re: The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans, Bob Kolker
    • Re: The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans, Malcolm
      • Re: The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans, Bob Kolker
      • Re: The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans, Tim Tyler
      • Re: The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans, Bob Kolker
      • Re: The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans, Tim Tyler
  • Message not available
    • Re: The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans, Bob Kolker
  • Re: The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humans, Ron O
• The Idle Shall Inherit the Earth, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Re: Genetic engineering, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Earth's early haze, TomHendricks474
• Relativity within ANY Theory., John Edser
  • Re: Relativity within ANY Theory., la-jetee
  • Re: Even "relative" can be relative, drosen0000
• Pleased to see this passage., TomHendricks474
• Psychological Neoteny?, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• ESSASYS ON SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ESSASYS ON SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, John Edser
• Programming/Modelling of Evolution, geralttee@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Programming/Modelling of Evolution, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Programming/Modelling of Evolution, dkomo
• GM Mosquitos for Disease Control, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Evolution by Choice, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• The relative logic of nonsense, John Edser
  • Re: The relative logic of nonsense, la-jetee
    • Re: The relative logic of nonsense, Perplexed in Peoria
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The relative logic of nonsense, John Edser
• Future Human Evolution, Leonid Gavrilov
  • Re: Future Human Evolution, Leonid Gavrilov
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Future Human Evolution, John Edser
    • Re: Future Human Evolution, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: Future Human Evolution, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Rodents, cockroaches and snakes, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Paper: Detecting Non-Brownian Trait Evolution in Adaptive Radiations, Robert Karl Stonjek
• Religion and the death spiral of the moth, dkomo
  • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, dkomo
      • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, Entertained by my own EIMC
      • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, dkomo
      • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, Entertained by my own EIMC
  • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, Entertained by my own EIMC
    • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, dkomo
  • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, dkomo
  • Message not available
    • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, dkomo
  • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, philip.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, John Edser
    • Re: Religion and the death spiral of the moth, dkomo
• Re: May contain magnetite, Earle Jones
• Evolutionary Theory, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Why Editors must dare to be dumb, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Why Editors must dare to be dumb, John Edser
    • Re: Why Editors must dare to be dumb, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Why Editors must dare to be dumb, John Edser
• How does genetic drift lead to self-organization, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Baldwin Effect-Speculative, drosen0000
  • Re: Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense, John Wilkins
  • Re: Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense (until you investigate more closely), Inman Harvey
    • Re: Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense (until you investigate more closely), William Morse
  • Re: Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense (until you investigate more closely), whitesickle@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense (until you investigate more closely), Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense (until you investigate more closely), whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense, dkomo
    • Re: Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense, Guy A Hoelzer
  • Re: Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense (until you investigate more closely), whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense, John Edser
    • Re: Baldwin Effect-Patent Nonsense, Entertained by my own EIMC
• Evolution's Slow Recovery, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Evolution's Slow Recovery, johnwl4@xxxxxxx
• Discovering, TomHendricks474
• RE: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, John Edser
  • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, Wirt Atmar
    • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, Wirt Atmar
    • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, William L Hunt
      • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, Tim Tyler
  • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, seemysig
    • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, Tim Tyler
    • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, William L Hunt
      • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, Tim Tyler
      • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, William Morse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, John Edser
  • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, John Edser
  • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, John Edser
  • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, John Edser
    • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, John Edser
  • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, John Edser
  • Re: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, John Edser
• Good books to read ?, Leonid Gavrilov
  • Re: Good books to read ?, Joe Felsenstein
• Re: John Edser, John Edser
  • Re: John Edser, Paul Crowley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: John Edser, John Edser
    • Re: John Edser, Paul Crowley
  • Re: John Edser, John Edser
• Paper: Accelerated Evolution of Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Humans, Robert Karl Stonjek
• Israeli Ingenuity 2003, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Computerstein, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Article: Evolutionary biology: To work or not to work, Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Set Nesting and Set Intersection Within Evolutionary Theory, John Edser
• Paper: Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild, Robert Karl Stonjek
• Article: On Symbiosis, Robert Karl Stonjek
• DNA in nonliving systems, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Re: Origin - the wrong word?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Origin - the wrong word?, Tom Hendricks
    • Re: Origin - the wrong word?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• What makes one allele dominant and another recessive?, Alan Meyer
  • Re: What makes one allele dominant and another recessive?, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: What makes one allele dominant and another recessive?, Wirt Atmar
  • Re: What makes one allele dominant and another recessive?, Ron O
• Co-Evolution, William Morse
• Hsp90, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Paper: Allopatric origins of microbial species, Robert Karl Stonjek
• Paper: Modelling bacterial speciation, Robert Karl Stonjek
• Lamarck, Darwin, and cultural evolution, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• The Future won't look like the present, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Popular conceptions of science, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Symmetry breaking and genetic assimilation, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Progress on canalization 2002, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Question on canalization of aggression, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE:Question on canalization of aggression, John Edser
• Re: Tabloid Crap, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Re: Biology of genocide, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Biology of genocide, drosen0000
  • Re: Biology of genocide, John Edser
  • Re: Biology of genocide, John Edser
    • Re: Biology of genocide, drosen0000
• Re: The Darwinian Interlude, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • Re: The Darwinian Interlude, Bob Kolker
• Re: Article on aggression...good read, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
• Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, feedbackdroid
  • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, John Edser
    • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, feedbackdroid
    • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, Glen M. Sizemore
    • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, feedbackdroid
    • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, feedbackdroid
  • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, John Edser
  • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, John Edser
    • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, Glen M. Sizemore
  • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, John Edser
    • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, Glen M. Sizemore
  • Re: We cannot escape our own mind injected element, John Edser
• Re: Evolutionary "wrong" turn?, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Evolutionary "wrong" turn?, drosen0000
• Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Wilkins
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Entertained by my own EIMC
    • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Wilkins
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Guy A Hoelzer
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Guy A Hoelzer
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Wilkins
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Entertained by my own EIMC
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Guy A Hoelzer
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
    • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Guy A Hoelzer
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Wilkins
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Larry Moran
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Wilkins
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, William Morse
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Guy A Hoelzer
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, William Morse
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
    • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Guy A Hoelzer
    • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Davidius
      • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Wilkins
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Guy A Hoelzer
      • Genetic engineering, Tim Tyler
      • Re: Genetic engineering, Bob Kolker
      • Re: Genetic engineering, Tim Tyler
      • Re: Genetic engineering, Entertained by my own EIMC
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
    • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Guy A Hoelzer
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, whitesickle@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Guy A Hoelzer
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
    • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
    • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser
    • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, Guy A Hoelzer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Evolution without either drift or selection?, Guy A Hoelzer
  • Re: Culture is not consciously developed? Q for Wilkins, John Edser

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint