Re: Robot Evolution

John Edser wrote:

No answer was provided (just rhetorical
assertions).

I didn't bother to read your answer, because you
failed to bother to comprehend mine.

My reason that mathematics is incomplete cites a
precise _mathematical_ reason that mathematics is
incomplete, a reason that was published by Kurt
Goedel in the form of a formal mathematical proof
that completely changed the future course of
mathematics, a proof well known to anyone with even
a minimal grasp of college mathematics.

Yours, since you rejected Goedel's proof due to your
being unable to comprehend it or even recognize it
by name, is left being mere uninformed opinionated
innumerate blather by someone incompetent to do
mathematics, you, about why mathematics is
incomplete.

That you prefer your innumerate blather to Goedel's
formal mathematical proof speaks volumes about your
failures to do the research you claim as your
profession, about your gross pan-situational
incompetence, and about your pathetic vastly
self-documented innumeracy.

But, of course, you ENJOY providing such proofs of
your status as an incorrigible professional Time
Wasting Moron.

It would be mean spirited of me indeed to resist
providing future opportunities (read "bait") for you
to use to make a fool of yourself in public on
other topics.

You do that demonstration of your membership in the
league of bell capped caperers, so well, and so
consistently, too, and you just cannot resist rising
to the bait.

However, you have taken this discussion clear off
topic for this newsgroup, so I'll be ignoring your
future unceasingly INFANTILE attempts to prove
yourself correct by sheer droning relentless
repetitive imbecility when, as ever, you are
abjectly the opposite of "correct" and seen so by
everyone concerned or looking on except yourself.

Your insanity in this regard is NOT MY PROBLEM.

HTH, HAND, JNOMCS

xanthian.


.

Relevant Pages