Re: The First Self-Replicator and early Lunar tides
- From: "Anthony Cerrato" <tcerrato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:26:32 -0400 (EDT)
"Tim Tyler" <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f031r9$1ism$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
markr1000 wrote:ones -
> Tim Tyler <seemy...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > IMO, the most likely locations are highly stable
> > deep in the ocean, or perhaps in underground caves:you
>
> From what I've been reading, stability is exactly what
> don't want. Inert substances are the pinnacle ofstability,
> they're also the opposite of life.years would
>
> Gigantic tides sloshing around for many millions of
> keep the oceans a constant soup of amino acids andother
> inorganic building blocks as well as creating billionsof tidal
> pools test tubes in which trillions of experimentswould being
> going on.whoever it is
>
> I ran across this in my search on early tides and
> paints a thorough picture. I have no idea what holesmight be
> poked in it beyond the talk of "originalnon-replicating atoms"
> which is silly consider the immense amount of aminoacids that
> would have been available in the absence of freeoxygen.
for
I consider rock pools a relatively unlikely environment
early life - due to general instability andinhospitability.
researchers,
They are relatively often invoked by other OOL
though. They like the concentration via evaporation, theand
sunlight, an influx of silt and the action of waves.
IMO, sunlight would probably fry the earliest organisms,
waves would smash them to bits.the
> Whatever else, I think stability is highly overrated in
> origin of life.high
Stability is a matter of degree. Too much and you have no
activity at all. Too much and you have a chaotic system.
Living systems lie in the middle of this spectrum.
However, in the context of the origin of life, we have a
temperature environment, bombarded by meteorites, and withlowest
widespread vulcanism.
Simultaneously, we have the least technologically advanced
creatures that ever existed, probably with one of the
ever abilities to resist environmental perturbations.ocean -
In this context, I feel the stability of life's cradle is
what needs emphasising.
IMO, it would be quite plausible if the bottom of the
and possibly underground environments like caves - werethe
only habitable environments for a considerable period oftime -
simply because anything on the surface of the young earthwould
get alternately irradiated, melted, boiled, and smashed tobits.
Stability is indeed a matter of degree re: OOL. The
"Goldilocks Principle" applies and over the million year
epochs that obtain for OOL to occur, Goldy equilibria surely
have occurred many times--and it only takes one robust first
replicator to start the ball rolling.
More and more I am coming around to believing that the best
locale for that "first primitive replicator" (FPR) to make
its appearance is the vicinity of the deep sea thermal
vents--based on that now well-known biochemical system. Once
founded, such life would undergo slow diasporas
outward from the vents, and in conjunction with Darwinian
evolution the FPR would eventually convert to the more
versatile biochem systems and metabolisms known to us today.
Anyway, that's my view at the moment...always subject to
change as more knowledge and data accumulate of course.
.....tonyC
--lock to reply.
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@xxxxxxxxxxx Remove
.
- References:
- Re: The First Self-Replicator and early Lunar tides
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: The First Self-Replicator and early Lunar tides
- Prev by Date: Call for Papers: WORLDCOMP'07, Las Vegas, June 25-28, Conferences in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing
- Next by Date: Re: Did Darwin say this?
- Previous by thread: Re: The First Self-Replicator and early Lunar tides
- Next by thread: Paper: RNA-templated DNA repair
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|