Re: Evolutionist withholds evidence on Haldane's Dilemma

On Apr 16, 1:25 pm, "Walter ReMine" <scie...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Evolutionist withholds evidence on Haldane's Dilemma

For many years I have publicly claimed Haldane's Dilemma is a major
unsolved problem for evolution. A problem so severe it threatens
macroevolution as a "fact" and evolutionary genetics as an empirical
science. Toward a solution, evolutionary geneticist, Leonard Nunney,
published a paper reporting his computer simulations. He claimed his
computer simulations show rates of beneficial evolution much faster
than the Haldane limit. Evolutionists now cite Nunney's computer
simulation as a refutation of my position.

Starting December 19, 2006, I sent emails to Prof. Nunney, expressing
my interest in his paper, and requesting access to his simulation
software. After several emails, across several months, I eventually
reached Professor Nunney by phone on April 5th. He acknowledged he had
received my emails, and said he had not responded because I "do not
publish in peer-reviewed journals." (his words)

I again requested his software for my examination of his published
results and methods. He declined, saying he will not share his
software with "people who do not publish in peer-reviewed
journals." (his words)

I'm sure Prof. Nunney is a fine person, but this is bad public policy.
Nunney's simulation is claimed as a solution to Haldane's Dilemma.
(Quite falsely, I would add.) And Nunney's work was done at a tax-
supported institution, (the University of California, Riverside). And
Haldane's Dilemma is part of a high profile public controversy
directly affecting our politics, and our public schools - where
evolutionists exert monopoly control. Evolutionists have an obligation
to be forthcoming on the matter. Yet they are withholding their
evidence.

Haldane's Dilemma is a scandal several decades long already - and the
scandal keeps getting worse.

-- Walter ReMinehttp://SaintPaulScience.com/withholding_evidence.htmhttp://SaintPaulScience.com/Haldane.htm

Hi.

I went to the link and your sig and encountered some of the same
problems you did on usenet. Anyway, I see you expressed interest
in the chimp - human dna comparison, and found this link:

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/316/5822/218

"But so far researchers have
come up short in linking genomic changes to traits subjected to
natural selection and other evolutionary forces ...


But the chimp data proved frustrating as well, because researchers
couldn't put the chimp-human comparisons into an evolutionary
context ..."



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Evolutionist withholds evidence on Haldanes Dilemma
    ... other scientists at request, sharing it with the general public is ... that anyone should be able to re-create the simulation. ... Toward a solution, evolutionary geneticist, Leonard Nunney, ... Evolutionists now cite Nunney's computer ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Evolutionist withholds evidence on Haldanes Dilemma
    ... if you re-create the simulation and get different ... Evolutionists now cite Nunney's computer ... Starting December 19, 2006, I sent emails to Prof. Nunney, expressing ... publish in peer-reviewed journals." ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Evolutionist withholds evidence on Haldanes Dilemma
    ... unsolved problem for evolution. ... Evolutionists now cite Nunney's computer ... simulation as a refutation of my position. ... Starting December 19, 2006, I sent emails to Prof. Nunney, expressing ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Evolutionist withholds evidence on Haldanes Dilemma
    ... unsolved problem for evolution. ... Evolutionists now cite Nunney's computer ... simulation as a refutation of my position. ... Starting December 19, 2006, I sent emails to Prof. Nunney, expressing ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)