Re: Evolutionist withholds evidence on Haldane's Dilemma

On Apr 18, 12:26 pm, Lorentz <drosen0...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You didn't tell him what your examination
would entail. .... The main problem is that
he doesn't think that you are a fine person.

You claim to have privileged information, available only to Nunney.
Are you Nunney, or someone representing him, and attempting to float a
defense for his non-cooperation and withholding of evidence? Answer:
Yes.

Once he gives you the program, you can
lie about what you have received. ....
For example, a lot of managers (including
school department heads) are Creationist.
Although not well known, this creates a
bias against scientists working in some
laboratories. If you claim that Nunney
made was incompetent, and based it on a
computer program that Nunney had made
while working under that manager, the
manager has an excuse to get rid on Nunney.

What a HOOT!!! What a paranoid, distorted perspective. You are
claiming "a lot of managers (including school department heads)" --
including evolutionary genetics departments, where Nunney works --
"are Creationist" and looking for "an excuse to get rid of Nunney" --
and they are KNOWN for getting away with such things -- and they might
successfully GET AWAY with it in Nunney's case! And all they need is
a manufactured charge of "incompetence" from little-ol' me! That is
far-gone paranoid even before your unfounded suggestion that I might
"lie" about Nunney's software.

Nunney is withholding key evidence. In the end, the issue is really
simple: Are evolutionists going to be the straightforward, open,
scientists they claim to be?

-- Walter ReMine
http://tinyurl.com/3dtzjq
http://SaintPaulScience.com/Haldane.htm
http://SaintPaulScience.com/withholding_evidence.htm


.

Loading