Re: Why don't male nipples work?
- From: Guy A Hoelzer <hoelzer@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:47:29 -0400 (EDT)
Kimura's Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution certainly qualifies as a
theory in my book. ALL notions of supernatural action are based on belief.
Guy
in article f404h4$1p0j$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, John W Edser at
edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 6/3/07 9:30 PM:
Guy A Hoelzer <hoelzer@xxxxxxx> wrote:-
This is the kind of BELIEF in Darwinism that Gould and Lewontin railed
against in their Spandrels paper. If you consistently premise research
questions on such a belief, it removes Darwinism itself from science.
JE:-
Guy, do you separate beliefs from theories or do you only separate
different
KINDS of beliefs?
I separate beliefs from theories. I wouldn't call an idea a belief unless
or until a critical view of the idea has been abandoned. In contrast, I
wouldn't call an idea a theory unless it is deeply embedded in critical
thinking.
JE:-
Please provide an example.
Regards,
John Edser
Independent Researcher
edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why don't male nipples work?
- From: John W Edser
- Re: Why don't male nipples work?
- References:
- Re: Why don't male nipples work?
- From: John W Edser
- Re: Why don't male nipples work?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why don't male nipples work?
- Next by Date: Re: Why don't male nipples work?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why don't male nipples work?
- Next by thread: Re: Why don't male nipples work?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|