Re: Life's range = 0-50C
- From: Tim Tyler <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:38:57 -0400 (EDT)
Perplexed in Peoria wrote:
<Jeremy.Winfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:f5u870$2euo$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is also a general consensus amongst biologists that the last common
ancestor was most likely a thermophile, since it is so deeply rooted
in the tree of life. Read the following for more detail: [URL snipped]
It is a fairly widespread belief, but I wouldn't call it a consensus.
One recent naysayer:
"Rooting the tree of life by transition analyses", Thomas Cavalier-Smith
http://www.biology-direct.com/content/1/1/19
He concludes that the LCA was a non-flagellate negibacterium with two
membranes, probably a photosynthetic green non-sulphur bacterium.
He cites this 2002 paper as one of the first to point out the problem:
"Phylogeny: a non-hyperthermophilic ancestor for bacteria."
http://calorierestriction.org/pmid/?n=12015592
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@xxxxxxxxxxx Remove lock to reply.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Life's range = 0-50C
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Life's range = 0-50C
- Prev by Date: Re: Is life sui generis?
- Next by Date: Re: Flying non-chordates?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is life sui generis?
- Next by thread: Re: Life's range = 0-50C
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|