Re: Life's range = 0-50C
- From: "Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmenegay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:39:21 -0400 (EDT)
"Tim Tyler" <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:f693d1$280e$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Perplexed in Peoria wrote:
<Jeremy.Winfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:f5u870$2euo$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is also a general consensus amongst biologists that the last common
ancestor was most likely a thermophile, since it is so deeply rooted
in the tree of life. Read the following for more detail: [URL snipped]
It is a fairly widespread belief, but I wouldn't call it a consensus.
One recent naysayer:
"Rooting the tree of life by transition analyses", Thomas Cavalier-Smith
http://www.biology-direct.com/content/1/1/19
That is a very nice paper (and like all Cavalier-Smith papers, very long and
very dense). I'm impressed by his reasoning, but a bit skeptical. I have
long believed that the LCA was a photoautotroph. But not an oxygenic one!
Cavalier-Smith's scheme makes being non-aerobic a derived secondary trait
which has been re-invented repeatedly in evolution. Well, maybe ...
Thx for the link, Tim.
.
- References:
- Re: Life's range = 0-50C
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: Life's range = 0-50C
- Prev by Date: Re: Life's range = 0-50C
- Next by Date: Re: Flying non-chordates?
- Previous by thread: Re: Life's range = 0-50C
- Next by thread: Re: Life's range = 0-50C
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|