The AEVASIVE advance of our ancestral anthropoids
- From: "Entertained by my own EIMC" <write_to_eimc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 18:57:34 -0400 (EDT)
The human lineage of "genophenotypes" started to gain a 'double (or
ambiadvantageous) edge' in the struggle for survival when the aftereffects
of conditioning by naturally inevitable adverse (destructive) lifetime
challenges (of a certain, and by acceptable approximation generally
definable, type) became convertible into constructive (i.e. ultimately
procreation promoting) "psychobehavioral" consequences by the emergence of
new neural functures that, to this effect, could "reroute" {almost literally
'neurohistomorphysiologically' so) the corresponding *endogenous sources* of
sensory-motivational stimulation.
These "endogenous sources..." can be seen - if considered by way of
generalizing - as a type of factor (in the phylogeny of folk) that is by any
basically normal and intact animal individual continuously computed through
the workings of its "actention selection serving system".
This endogenous factor [=dynamic imprints left by stressors of a generally
definable type or subcategory of "predicaments or ordeals" (please
interprete with SEPTIC humor and allow yourself an AEVASIVE but far from
inEPT wry smile)] can be conceptualized, in a curly (or elaborately plaited
together) way, as "Conditioned-in Unconsciously Reverberating Stressors
(specifically "SHI-type" such), Effecting Symptoms - or CURSES, for short.
CURSES can be seen (and classified) as a sub category of adverse (primarily
adverse/destructive/pruning/negative) "selection pressures" (meant in a
Darwinian, Edserian, and EPT, sense).
P
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Flying non-chordates?
- Next by Date: Re: Is life sui generis?
- Previous by thread: Our Biotech Future - Freeman Dyson
- Next by thread: Re: Maybe we didn't interbreed with Neandertals afterall
- Index(es):