Re: The driving force of evolution


first_name@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian) wrote:-
"The new mutation theory of phenotypic evolution" by Masatoshi Nei
PNAS | July 24, 2007 | vol. 104 | no. 30 | 12235-12242
Abstract
Recent studies of developmental biology have shown that the genes
controlling phenotypic characters expressed in the early stage of
development are highly conserved and that recent evolutionary changes
have occurred primarily in the characters expressed in later stages of
development. Even the genes controlling the latter characters are
generally conserved, but there is a large component of neutral or nearly
neutral genetic variation within and between closely related species.
Phenotypic evolution occurs primarily by mutation of genes that interact
with one another in the developmental process. The enormous amount of
phenotypic diversity among different phyla or classes of organisms is a
product of accumulation of novel mutations and their conservation that
have facilitated adaptation to different environments. Novel mutations
may be incorporated into the genome by natural selection (elimination of
preexisting genotypes) or by random processes such as genetic and
genomic drift. However, once the mutations are incorporated into the
genome, they may generate developmental constraints that will affect the
future direction of phenotypic evolution. It appears that the driving
force of phenotypic evolution is mutation, and natural selection is of
secondary importance.
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104/30/12235

JE:-
This is just back-to-the-future, stuff. The mutationists were wrong in the
past and they remain wrong, today. Chance selection (random mutation and
genetic drift) cannot compete and win against non random selection. The
problem which needs to be addressed here, i.e. not just evaded is, how can
genetics account for all the heritable differences between say, a chimp and
a human when over 99% of the genes that code for anything at all remain the
same in both. Note: both have only tiny genomes (20,000 or so coding genes).
The answer that makes the most sense to me is that NON additive genetic
epistasis accounts for _most_ of the _heritable_ variation along with above
the gene level forms of inheritance like gene imprinting. Both remain
deleted from popular Neo Darwinian models.

Regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
    ... area of genetics and those that are questioning that the alhorithm is ... And does it put the mutation rate ... And of course we need to know the genes and mutations involved ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Part 1 (of 3): What are major aspects of evolutionary theory?
    ... > and there's about twice that space on average between genes. ... accounted for by SNPs and how much by everything else. ... Well each new mutation occurs in only a single individual, ... has very little chance of going extinct so long as the population ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The driving force of evolution
    ... Recent studies of developmental biology have shown that the genes ... Phenotypic evolution occurs primarily by mutation of genes that interact ... product of accumulation of novel mutations and their conservation that ... genetics account for all the heritable differences between say, ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
    ... gene pool of 'humans' as being the result of random mutations as opposed ... Genes get spread through the gene pool by sexual reproduction. ... classified as "random mutation"? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
    ... Genes get spread through the gene pool by sexual reproduction. ... Actually, mutation *usually* produces new alleles (variants, ... hearing that they will believe in evolution when they see a cat give ...
    (talk.origins)