Re: Why are there no phosynthetic animals?
- From: Tim Tyler <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 13:36:50 -0400 (EDT)
Erland Gadde wrote:
If we (perhaps somewhat improperly) define "animal" a mobile,
macroscopic organism, then why are there no photosynthetic animals?
All photosynthetic orgamisms I know of are either immobile plants or
(possibly mobile) microorganisms?
Symbiosis works well enough.
Corals are animals with photosynthetic symbionts.
Sea slugs are mobile photosynthesizing animals:
http://www.seaslugforum.net/showall.cfm?base=solarpow
.....that use algae to do the conversion work.
Why reinvent something - when you can borrow an existing solution?
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@xxxxxxxxxxx Remove lock to reply.
.
- References:
- Why are there no phosynthetic animals?
- From: Erland Gadde
- Why are there no phosynthetic animals?
- Prev by Date: Re: Artificial life likely in 3 to 10 years
- Next by Date: Re: Why are there no phosynthetic animals?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why are there no phosynthetic animals?
- Next by thread: Re: Why are there no phosynthetic animals?
- Index(es):