Re: Article: Beyond a 'speed limit' on mutations, species risk extinction



inmanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Oct 3, 6:25 pm, Tim Tyler <seemy...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:

Beyond a 'speed limit' on mutations, species risk extinction
Harvard University scientists have identified a virtual "speed limit" on the
rate of molecular evolution in organisms, and the magic number appears to be
6 mutations per genome per generation -- a level beyond which species run
the strong risk of extinction as their genomes lose stability.

From adult to adult presumably - and ignoring junk DNA.

This is rather contrary to population genetics:

``If the offspring have on the average one harmful mutation each,
then the population will degenerate; this is called "error
catastrophe." This puts a bound on how many non-neutral mutations
can occur per generation. It cannot be much more than about one
per generation, and in fact, it must be significantly less, since
most non-neutral mutations are harmful.''

-http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/genetics.html

(A) This latter statement must in general be false, because any such
error catastrophe depends in part on the typical number of offspring
an individual has. If species X has an average 32 offspring per
individual (of which one typically survives to maintain constant
population size) whereas species Y, otherwise similar, has only 2
offspring (of which one survives), then X can have 6 times the
mutation rate of Y before reaching any such error catastrophe. Hence
any such general statement must include some factor log(avge num
offspring) in there -- and log2(32)=6.

As with the original article, I think this can be reasonably
expected to be adult-to-adult (or similar) - otherwise oysters
and elms would be a /serious/ spanner in the works.

This whole topic - including the reference to a speed limit - does
relate to a paper previously discussed on occasion here:
R.P. Worden. A Speed Limit For Evolution
Journal of Theoretical Biology, 176, 137 - 152, 1995
available on
http://dspace.dial.pipex3.com/jcollie/sle/

I was never very impressed with that one:

``Worden's whole paper seems to be almost entirely without merit.''

- http://alife.co.uk/essays/no_speed_limit_for_evolution/

Notes:
Correct URL: http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/jcollie/sle/
Anal nit-pick: log2(32)=5! ;-)
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@xxxxxxxxxxx Remove lock to reply.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Article: Beyond a speed limit on mutations, species risk extinction
    ... Harvard University scientists have identified a virtual "speed limit" on the ... rate of molecular evolution in organisms, and the magic number appears to be ... This puts a bound on how many non-neutral mutations ... If species X has an average 32 offspring per ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: The Living Dead
    ... of e^for the mean relative fitness. ... offspring per breeding pair is enough to maintain a constant population ... size then deleterious mutations will accumulate indefinitely until the ... I'm not exactly understanding why recessiveness would reduce the ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Living Dead
    ... >> mutations are able to reproduce at all. ... >> have the same maximum reproductive rate of 4 per couple, ... You will have more than enough offspring surviving to ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Living Dead
    ... > with more than 97 detrimental mutations. ... spread in the number of deleterious mutations carried (which is just ... >> the selection coefficient. ... >> the average lightly loaded offspring is twice as likely to reproduce ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Living Dead
    ... They mate to produce 20,000 offspring. ... > of 3, the average number of deleterious mutations, per individual, is ... > reproducing population can go uphill, ... > For example, of those with a neutral or positive mutational balance, ...
    (talk.origins)