Re: Metamorphosis - plausible evolutionary scenario?
- From: Tim Tyler <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:56:39 -0500 (EST)
Lorentz wrote:
On Nov 16, 3:20 pm, Tim Tyler <seemy...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No doubt the ancestors of butterflies did not undergo such aI think the modern consensus is that the common ancestors of all
radical transformation - and could not fly. They probably
just grew legs and genitals: fairly orthodox developmental
steps that do not involve self-liquefaction.
winged insects could fly, but could not do the metamorphosis.
Right - that makes more sense.
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@xxxxxxxxxxx Remove lock to reply.
.
- References:
- Metamorphosis - plausible evolutionary scenario?
- From: pineapple . link
- Re: Metamorphosis - plausible evolutionary scenario?
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: Metamorphosis - plausible evolutionary scenario?
- From: Lorentz
- Metamorphosis - plausible evolutionary scenario?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it sure that DNA can not mutate also because of mental factors?
- Next by Date: Re: Is it sure that DNA can not mutate also because of mental
- Previous by thread: Re: Metamorphosis - plausible evolutionary scenario?
- Next by thread: Re: Metamorphosis - plausible evolutionary scenario?
- Index(es):