Re: Nei's "new mutation theory" resurrects William Bateson

Arlin <arlin.stoltzfus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Does anyone out there still fail to seen a distinction between the
"new mutations" or mutationist view, parodied by Dobzhansky, Mayr,
Stebbins, et al., as the "lucky mutant" view , and the Modern
Synthesis view based on "shifting gene frequencies" in the "gene
pool" ?

That would be me. Sounds like some sort of hair splitting.

DK


.

Quantcast