Re: Directed evolution



On Dec 31 2007, 12:09 pm, Lorentz <drosen0...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 31, 2:22 am, feedbackdroid <feedbackdr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Which just shows that systems biology has nothing useful to
say about the origin of life.
;-)

Maybe, maybe not. Maybe just knowing the bits and pieces, ACGT, etc,
at the purely reductionist level will suffice.

      I became a physicist because I like reductionist science.
However, I think that understanding things at a systems level is also
important because of redundancy. Redundancy is a fundamental property
in the universe that is hidden by reductionist explanations. Systems
models are complementary to reductionist models, and together provide
a more complete model of the universe than either could provide
alone.



I agree with all of your comments here. My comment to P-i-P was meant
to indicate possible "assumptions" inherent in the reductionist
approach .... maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe.

At this day and age, however, it should be clear to everyone in the
universe that once you take the pieces apart, you need to put them
together again, in a way that recreates the original, both
structurally AND functionally ... or else you've only solved half the
problem.

During each higher level of such synthesis, "new" rules and forms of
interactions - both local and global - come into play, and these
interactions are what ultimately determines whether the "final" form
works properly or not.

P-i-P could take a dead cat found by the side of the road, and reduce
it to a soup of atoms and ACGT, but it's highly unlikely he could take
that soup and recreate the living cat. What is missing? All those
fancy [and correct] interactions that take place at every successively
higher level of the overall "system".



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: The gators got yer granny - chomp chomp
    ... faith, is under much less logical strain than any believer. ... belief there is a Creator does not either. ... Universe was an intentional creation. ...     You are of course, free to draw your own conclusions and find your ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Winner! Re: Chez Watt Ballot July 7, 2008
    ... followed the preceding details of the debate would have no reason to think ... all the universes, then everybody lives in a universe containing ... there could still be an awful lot of other planets ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: A question for any of our resident atheists
    ... universe and the myriad of lifeforms within it somehow just come about ... planet in a universe of billions and billions of stars and even more ...   It doesn't surprise me at all that on at least one small planet ... in that insanely huge universe conditions came together to create life. ...
    (rec.music.gdead)
  • Re: How Our Brains Ignore Unpleasant Facts was: Re: The Reasonable
    ... Apparent age. ... that you realize that the apparent age argument ... universe to operate properly it might well be ...   igneous rocks. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Blog: Questions for "Evolutionists".
    ...     1. ... Where did the space for the universe come from? ... The matter condensed out of the energy of the Big Bang, ... guy does get to biological evolution ask him about that. ...
    (talk.origins)