Logic Gives But One Choice On OOL. Can any find another?

Logic suggests that life must have began as a reaction to the sun/uv/
heat cycle.
It alone fit the 3 criteria:
1. Force that is constant over time
2. Force that is cyclical.
3. Force that includes variation within it.

First a basic premise. There is no other way to start life then with
some force.
There on my table my salt does not want to eat, and my pepper does not
want to replicate.
Chemicals will not do anything unless there is FIRST a force pushing
them to chemical action.

No chemical system can adapt to a force that is inconstant.
Does anyone think otherwise?

No chemical system can adapt to a force that is not cyclical.
If there is no cycle, then either it continues to warm up till all
chemical systems are destroyed,
or irt continues to cool down until all chemical reactions are stoped.
Does anyone think otherwise?

No chemical system can adapt without some variation.
Variation leads to the ability to adapt. Without it no chemical system
can adapt to its environment.
Does anyone think otherwise?

The only force in our environment that is
constant,
cyclical
and allows variation

Is the sun/uv.

Name any other force that fits. There is none. And
when you look with an overview of what life is, you
see it's constant, cyclical, and allows for variation
that leads to adaptation. it mirrors the sun cycle in
all its parts. It is obviously a reaction to the sun cycle.

That means that we have to give up the idea of a one
time fluke event with odds that are beyond
astronomical, (let alone having this happen multiple
times). Instead we have a sun-forced response that, didn't LEAD to
life,
but FORCED it as the most stable response in that environment.

If after bombardment phase, or any specific time period, does not fit
the sun
scenario, then it had to begin before or after. We can rule those
times out.

The constant, cyclical, with variation, force, trumps
all other factors , including the bombardment
barricade. I don't see how it could not.
Does anyone disagree?

Comments welcome

I

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [OOL] The Cyclical Part
    ... >>> Someone posted on SBE about their ideas on variation ... >>> life and where it might have come from. ... >> The cycle need not have been more complicated than ... such building-block molecules might possibly be formed which ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: [OOL] The Cyclical Part
    ... >> there is variation because life mimics the sun heat cycle. ... without the universal process of sun and solar system formation the ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Origin of NASAs definition of Life
    ... within some locale to make more of itself (by consuming raw abiotic ... perfect for the chemical system to work. ... be some locale where that temperature range actually exists. ... form of life must either adapt or go extinct. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: There was never a moment in time when
    ... >>> There was never a moment in time when life began. ... >>> step was more stable and better 'adapted' to its environment ... >>> origin as no independent development of one replicator, ... > What is being replicated is a chemical system that better adapts to its ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
Loading