Correcting Neo Darwinian Denial
- From: "John W Edser" <edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:28:21 -0500 (EST)
Kevin Wayne Williams <kww.nihongo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:-
Evolution article in BioScience Encyclopedia -
http://www.bioscience.ws/encyclopedia/index.php?title=Evolution
Critical omission within the above website:
The only way to empirically refute Darwinian evolution (which remains the
only refutable theory of evolution that we have) is to force the total
number of infertile forms raised to fertile adulthood per parent per
population to remain exactly the same. I term this critical, final but
100%
omitted from Neo Darwinism fitness "Total Darwinian Fitness" (TDF). It
provides the only falsifiable frame of reference that evolutionary
theory has
Rather than comment, why not edit? The BioScience Encylopedia is just a
snapshot of Wikipedia. Edit Wikipedia, and eventually your changes will
show up in BioScience, Answers.com, and a bunch of other places.
KWW
JE:-
Hi Kevin,
I have given serious consideration to your suggestion. I cannot see that it
is ethical for me to make the required edits because they represent my own
work. IOW I think that somebody else should make them quoting myself as the
author with particular reference to sbe postings. I have mostly confined
discussion of these major problems to within sci.bio.evolution because this
particular group provides quality a kitchen table discussion as to what is
going on in the front room. As we all know, the real work goes on around the
kitchen table. The front room is mostly devoted to the politics of power and
kudos :-)
If anybody is interested I have moved epistemological discussion to the
critical rationalist discussion group: CriticalRationalism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Regards,
John Edser
Independent Researcher
edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Prev by Date: Re: No island fossils
- Next by Date: News: First 'rule' of evolution suggests that life is destined to become more complex
- Previous by thread: Dawkins "Blind watchman"
- Next by thread: News: First 'rule' of evolution suggests that life is destined to become more complex
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
