Re: News: And the first animal on Earth was a...
- From: Aidan Karley <name1_name2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
In article <ftqu60$k7r$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lorentz wrote:
One possible source of error they may not have considered isHas "lateral gene transfer" been demonstrated to occur for any
hybridization. Maybe they ctenophores didn't branch off. Maybe the
first ctenophore was a hybrid between a sponge-like creature (no
nerves) and a cnidarian like creature (with nerves). Or maybe a
lateral gene transfer added some sponge DNA to a jellyfish.
Eukaryotes? Certainly it has for Bacteria and Archaebacteria, but
Eukaryotes ? I'm not so sure.
--
Aidan Karley,
Aberdeen, Scotland
Written at Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:28 +0100, but posted later.
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: News: And the first animal on Earth was a...
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: News: And the first animal on Earth was a...
- From: DK
- Re: News: And the first animal on Earth was a...
- References:
- News: And the first animal on Earth was a...
- From: Robert Karl Stonjek
- Re: News: And the first animal on Earth was a...
- From: Lorentz
- News: And the first animal on Earth was a...
- Prev by Date: Re: how's it known where Cambrian strata begin?
- Next by Date: Re: News: And the first animal on Earth was a...
- Previous by thread: Re: News: And the first animal on Earth was a...
- Next by thread: Re: News: And the first animal on Earth was a...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|