Re: sci.bio.evolution mailing list
- From: John W Edser <edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 02:20:04 -0400 (EDT)
sci.bio.evolution moderation account wrote:
..I can't imagine any situation whereby the universe is
deterministic or completely repeatable on replay, even replicating the
original conditions.
JE:-
Falsifiable, monocentric Darwinian theory (not to be confused within non
falsifiable, polycentric, Neo Darwinian models all of which remain
derived from Darwinian theory via a process of oversimplification)
provide an interesting prediction. Given the original random conditions,
if TDF (Total Darwinian Fitness defined as the total number of fertile
forms reproduced per parent per population)for each and every fertile
form is known and documented for one population then in theory, the
evolutionary tape can be replayed for that population. Note that
populations evolve only because fertile individuals are naturally
selected and not the reverse. Each TDF provides just the one fitness
constant per selectee per population simply because each selectee can
only have one fitness maximand and not two or more because they will
contest. Every TDF is compared by simple default within nature to every
other within one population allowing the fittest parent to contain all
the others as just a reversible fitness set intersection and NOT as a
non reversible proper sub sets of fitness, allowing the Darwinian
selective process to be repeated in theory. The Darwinian natural
selective process is a default comparison of each TDF per population
providing an exact grading of every selectee within one population from
selected for to selected against, automatically. Therefore if TDF is
known per seletee, the genetics of each selectee is known and the random
starting conditions are known, all these selective events could in
theory, be replayed repeating the evolutionary events for that population.
Regards,
John Edser
Independent Researcher
edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Prev by Date: Re: "Inductive intelligence" or a "generalist" cognitive bias in
- Next by Date: Re: Evolution is NOT random
- Previous by thread: Re: sci.bio.evolution mailing list
- Next by thread: Re: sci.bio.evolution mailing list
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
