Re: sci.bio.evolution mailing list
- From: John W Edser <edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:12:54 -0400 (EDT)
"Ouroboros_Rex" <its@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:-
"Cj" <Cj@xxxxxxxx> wrote:-
I've noticed that there are a lot of very vocal AGP denialists in
Australia and New Zealand. Is is geography, education or
conservatism? As a biologist I have noted enormous changes in the
distribution and abundance of both terrestrial and marine species in
eastern North America in the last two decades. These changes are
unidirectional and strongly correlated with contemporary temperature
records. These data are not climate models but a summation of all
available data in my area of interest, represented by a number of
theoretical models, suggests that AGW is a very probable prospect.
JE:-
Hi Cj,
If a theory cannot be falsified then it _cannot be sufficiently
understood_. If climate change is predominately caused by recent CO2
emissions and not the reverse, then what will falsify this?
Any finding that implies CO2 cannot act in the manner described would
falsify AGW.
JE:-
Please provide an example.
snip<
Regards,
John Edser
Independent Researcher
edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Evolution is NOT random
- Next by Date: Basic Frames Of Reference
- Previous by thread: Re: sci.bio.evolution mailing list
- Next by thread: Re: sci.bio.evolution mailing list
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
