Re: Evolution is NOT random

Paul Ciszek wrote:

The moderator wrote:
As you all know, I regard "intelligent design" as crypto-, or not
so crypto-, creationism. Hence, discussion about it doesn't belong
in this newsgroup.

Hmm. What about:
Lee Smolin: The Life of the Cosmos;
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Life-Cosmos-Lee-Smolin/dp/075380123X/
James Gardner: Biocosm;
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Biocosm-Scientific-Evolution-Intelligent-Architect/dp/1930722222/

James Gardner: Intelligent-Universe;
http://www.amazon.com/Intelligent-Universe-Emerging-Mind-Cosmos/dp/1564149196/

"Intelligent Design" as the term is used in the US right now refers
to a fraud. Those who invented "Intelligent Design" do not believe it,
it is merely a tool for them to use against the teaching of evolution
in public schools. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_document

JE:-
Hi Paul,


The only valid criticism of ID that I know of is that it cannot be
falsified. Belief/disbelief has little to do with the sciences but
everything to do with group based politics. Sadly, most of the criticism
of ID that is made within the sciences remains rhetorical. The reason
why falsifiability has been removed from evolutionary theory is because
Neo Darwinism cannot be falsified. Mathematics is not a science.

Regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx






.

Relevant Pages