Re: Evolution is NOT random
In article <g4dpv8$el8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
John W Edser <edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not until you have explained more clearly what you mean by "process" and
by "pattern".
JE:-
Process: Any falsifiable theory of causation, i.e. any bona fide theory
of science.
Pattern: The perceptual result of any process.
I also do not understand "OTOH all random patterns provide the same
random pattern."
JE:-
All random processes produce the same pattern.
Then the "perceptual result" of any random roll of dice must always be
the same dice numbers coming up, as the "perceptual result" of rolling a
pair of dice is a number between 2 and 12.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Evolution is NOT random
... Any falsifiable theory of causation, i.e. any bona fide theory ... of science. ... Pattern: The perceptual result of any process. ... that goes on at every higher scale within the cosmos. ... (sci.bio.evolution) - Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
... but proof is not how any science works. ... a transmission is unlikely to be the cause of the pattern. ... >Thus evo could be described to fit a tree or non-tree genetic profile. ... There is no specific observation that would falsify, once and for all, ... (talk.origins) - Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
... What distinguishes string theory from IDiocy is that the former ... >> the theory as confirmed science in public high schools. ... > And I wish to ask you, would the example prime/Pi alternating pattern ... We still count him as one of the greatest scientists of all time. ... (talk.origins) - Re: Entropy in crystalization: up or down?
... pattern compressibility. ... The random aspect of the pattern is not ... sure of their hypothesis for the string based on substring analysis. ... Science isn't about 100% perfection. ... (talk.origins) - Re: The Cosmological Argument
... science says it is done by and that the evidence supports. ... Science does just that for those questions for which evidence is ... record must show the appropriate pattern of fossils *and* the genome ... explanation is more correct, but I certainly agree that I think that ... (talk.origins) |
|