Re: Why no new species of man?
- From: Tim Tyler <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:34:31 -0400 (EDT)
On Jul 10, 8:50 pm, oprah.cho...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
A few hundred thousand years ago, the world population was very smal
yet we had several species of man. In the past 1000 years the world
population has grown orders of magnitude larger, yet how come no new
species have evolved?
My understanding was evolution depends on population and time. The
greater the product of those two, the faster the evolution. So why are
we not seeing radically new species man emerge when more people are
born in one day ( ~4 million ) then lived in the world for milleniums
100,000 years ago.
DNA is old news. These days the cutting edge of evolution is
cultural - and the future lies with the new replicators. In cultural
evolution, developments are indeed happening very quickly.
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@xxxxxxxxxxx Remove lock to
reply.
.
- References:
- Why no new species of man?
- From: oprah . chopra
- Why no new species of man?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why no new species of man?
- Next by Date: Re: Why no new species of man?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why no new species of man?
- Next by thread: Re: Why no new species of man?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|