Re: Evolution is NOT random
- From: Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:32:46 -0400 (EDT)
In article <g5ivqc$s5i$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
John Edser <edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I understand that the unaided human eye, under suitable circumstances,
can detect a single quantum of light impinging on the retina.
That strikes me as being a quantum event perceived without the aid of
any machine.
JE:-
I don't think that the perception of one photon via the unaided human
eye (if true) would validly allow the claim that the human eye can
perceive unaided, one quantum event.
If the mind of that human perceives what his/her eye detected, which is
implied, most others would allow it, and justifiably so.
.
- References:
- Re: Evolution is NOT random
- From: John Edser
- Re: Evolution is NOT random
- Prev by Date: Re: Panspermia Catch 22
- Next by Date: Re: Rewriting Darwin: The new non-genetic inheritance
- Previous by thread: Re: Evolution is NOT random
- Next by thread: Re: Evolution is NOT random
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|