Re: Evolution is NOT random
- From: John Edser <edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:42:33 -0400 (EDT)
Virgil <Virgil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:-
You choose to DEFINE quantum events as those imperceptible to humans
without some sort of mechanical assistance.
I do not.
JE:-
No, I argued (above) that quantum changes cannot be perceived using just
the human senses. IOW, a machine is required to observe a quantum change.
Which human perception of a single light quantum being absorbed by the
retina disproves.
JE:-
Even the perception of one photon by the human retina, if proved, does
not constitute the perception of one quantum CHANGE.
Regards,
John Edser
Independent Researcher
edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evolution is NOT random
- From: Virgil
- Re: Evolution is NOT random
- Prev by Date: News: RNA in control
- Next by Date: Re: Sympatric Speciation or Speciation without Changes in
- Previous by thread: Re: Evolution is NOT random
- Next by thread: Re: Evolution is NOT random
- Index(es):