Re: News: Meteorite experiment deals blow to 'bugs from space' theory



On 30 Sep., 18:41, Tim Tyler <seemy...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As a small particle, you would lose heat quickly into the cold dark
reaches of space. With the right approach, you could probably
fall to the ground - and still land as a hailstone.

Maybe even without a special approach. IMHO the
problem with the mission was the fact that the heavy
vehicle at the back of the stone kept pushing at 7.5
km/s, thus cooking the stone thoroughly.
A lone stone would have lost speed quickly and
probably suffered only surface burns. At least
that's what centimeter-sized meteorites or fragments
found on the ground look like.

Ralf

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Wolter talk report
    ... >> inger wrote: ... >> anything at all in relation to land. ... All it supports is the story on the stone - nothing else. ... one was to consider a 1520's "forgery". ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Wolter talk report
    ... >>> anything at all in relation to land. ... the stone does not support a former ... > You are missing the voyage to find the stone to prove the "land ... Inger E ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: 25,000 cubic feet of stone
    ... How much stone is there? ... A lot of land in areas of PA is almost 100% large ... I have not purchased the land yet so I am free to purchase ... Do you know how they quarry the "roughly square" ...
    (alt.home.repair)
  • Re: Wolter talk report
    ... Seppo Renfors wrote: ... > anything at all in relation to land. ... All it supports is the story on the stone - nothing else. ... What Inger says makes no sense. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Wolter talk report
    ... > Seppo Renfors wrote: ... >> anything at all in relation to land. ... All it supports is the story on the stone - nothing else. ... What Inger says makes no sense. ...
    (sci.archaeology)

Loading