Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection
- From: dkomo <dkomo871@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:01:45 -0500 (EST)
Tim Tyler wrote:
dkomo wrote:
Richard Dawkins proposed that a rough measure of complexity for an organism
is the length of its description. [...]
That's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity
--
LOL.
"Incomputability of Kolmogorov complexity
The first result is that there is no way to effectively compute K.
Theorem. K is not a computable function.
In other words, there is no program which takes a string s as input and
produces the integer K(s) as output."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity#Incomputability_of_Kolmogorov_complexity
http://tinyurl.com/5vjtkl
--dkomo@xxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection
- From: William Morse
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection
- From: DK
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection
- From: r norman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection
- References:
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection
- Prev by Date: Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection
- Next by Date: Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection
- Previous by thread: Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection
- Next by thread: Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|