Re: Why Life Originated (And Why it Continues)

To me there seems to be nothing new about what the two (father and son)
Finns has found even if I allow myself to interpret the article so that it
makes sense (which I don't find it does without reading between the lines).

Life's logical (evolutionary) emergence into its dizzying diversity of
forms, functures and behaviors can only be EPTly understood [how I insinuate
my centrally anthropically oriented and entirely science-aligned
encompassing philosophical thinking about What Is (was and will be) going
on] in somewhat etymologically pioneering terms.

(However, I won't use any of the most pioneering ones here.)

Anyhow, I can only conclude and construe that Life is the result of an
eternal potential (of, and a characteristic of, What Is) to produce, amongst
else, universes (spacetimes) with a pattern-forming (matter-pattern-forming)
tendency [or energy-matter patterning potential or an 'evolutionary pressure
totality' (EPT)] that can very well be divided into an obviously primary
(constructive or positively productive in character) aspect tentatively
thought of and referred to as the 'opportunity (type)' aspect (of EPT) and a
likewise intrinsic and approximately dialectically related fundamentally
secondary "adversity actualizing/type' (pattern pruning) aspect of EPT.
As far as any evolutionary process goes the former aspect would obviously
have to "outperform" the latter extensively and persistently enough in at
least one suitable enough locality to produce "Life as we know it" (i.e.
know it through "eclectic perceptive thinking' or by "eclectic proofs" - of
its evolved existence ;)).

Even just this portion of EPT understanding (or knowing) requires a
Tolerance-principled intellectual attitude but it does not require any
single defintion of complexity that is indisputably encompassing whilst
acceptable to all. ;-)



.

Quantcast