Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- From: Tim Tyler <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:15:29 -0400 (EDT)
On Jul 2, 12:05=A0am, Adam Skrodzki <adamskrod...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I want to ask why complex animals are usual divided into sexes and are
not intersexual. I know some evolutionary explanation for advantages
of sexual reproduction against asexual, but I've never heard
explanation why sexual reproduction is not made by pairs of
intersexual individuals. I now it is popular among invertebrates why
it disappeard for vertebrates?
I will be appreciate for any help like link to a book where is an
explanation or even name of author ;).
I have a page on that topic:
http://alife.co.uk/essays/gender_division/
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@xxxxxxxxxxx Remove lock to
reply.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- From: Vu Ngo
- Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- From: Adam Skrodzki
- Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- References:
- Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- From: Adam Skrodzki
- Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- Prev by Date: Re: Bingo! Sleep mysteries unfold
- Next by Date: UV Study
- Previous by thread: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- Next by thread: Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|