Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- From: "Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmenegay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 01:36:46 -0400 (EDT)
"Tim Tyler" <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 2, 12:05=A0am, Adam Skrodzki <adamskrod...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I want to ask why complex animals are usual divided into sexes and are
not intersexual. I know some evolutionary explanation for advantages
of sexual reproduction against asexual, but I've never heard
explanation why sexual reproduction is not made by pairs of
intersexual individuals. I now it is popular among invertebrates why
it disappeard for vertebrates?
I will be appreciate for any help like link to a book where is an
explanation or even name of author ;).
I have a page on that topic:
http://alife.co.uk/essays/gender_division/
Nice essay, Tim. But there are two features of animal hermaphroditism
that you ought to mention and include in the essay.
1. Some hermaphroditic animals require reciprocal coitus. But plants
don't/can't use this strategy. Instead, they broadcast the male pollen.
Why don't plants engage in coitus? My guess is because they don't
have a fixed shape. (Well, also because they are immobile).
2. Other hermaphroditic animals are serial hermaphrodites. But I don't
think that any (presumably perennial) plants are. Note that a serial
hermaphrodite is automatically sexually dimorphic and subject to
both male-combat and female-choice forms of sexual selection. My
own speculation is that serial hermaphroditism is the evolutionary
precursor of dioecious sexuality.
.
- References:
- Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- From: Adam Skrodzki
- Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- From: Tim Tyler
- Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- Prev by Date: Re: Evolution of Anger and Fear
- Next by Date: Re: Bingo! Sleep mysteries unfold
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- Next by thread: Re: Why Sexual reproduction is more popular
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|