Re: Fitness Requires A Constant Frame Of Reference.
- From: Earle Jones <earle.jones@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:50:26 -0400 (EDT)
In article <h302up$2f9l$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Earle Jones <earle.jones@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <h2jbi1$2mr3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
John Edser <edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm pretty sure it can define one.
JE:- Hi Jim,
I would be very interested in an example:-)
The one I had in mind is the constant number one (1).
But 1 as an _integer_ is not constant because it is infinitely
divisible....
*
John Edser:
Sorry to break in here.
If you believe that 1 (integer one) is not constant because it is
infinitely divisible, then I ask you this:
What are your qualifications as an "independent researcher"? What is
your educational background? Are you qualified to discuss these things?
Thanks,
earle
*
*
John Edser: You haven't answered my questions.
earle
*
.
- References:
- Re: Fitness Requires A Constant Frame Of Reference.
- From: John Edser
- Re: Fitness Requires A Constant Frame Of Reference.
- From: Earle Jones
- Re: Fitness Requires A Constant Frame Of Reference.
- Prev by Date: Evolution of sex revisited
- Next by Date: Re: Evolution of Anger and Fear
- Previous by thread: Re: Fitness Requires A Constant Frame Of Reference.
- Next by thread: Re: Fitness Requires A Constant Frame Of Reference.
- Index(es):