Re: Radioactive boyscout--Is it a literary hoax?
From: Richard Henry (rphenry_at_home.com)
Date: 06/10/04
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Re: stunning news: Immunity from MadCow Disease; the model of Manufacturing Sites gone Awry is more accurate than Prusiner Model"
- Previous message: Mohammed Farooq: "Re: NITROGEN'S oxidation number in N2O"
- In reply to: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: Radioactive boyscout--Is it a literary hoax?"
- Next in thread: dave e: "Re: Radioactive boyscout--Is it a literary hoax?"
- Reply: dave e: "Re: Radioactive boyscout--Is it a literary hoax?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:39:00 -0700
"Dirk Bruere at Neopax" <dirk@neopax.com> wrote in message
news:2ipv6sFq2psnU11@uni-berlin.de...
> dave e wrote:
> > You have a low standard of evidence if you believe that the mere
> > existence of an atomic energy merit badge proves that a particular boy
> > in Michigan built a nuclear reactor in his mother's potting shed
> > (which is what the Harper's article claims)
>
> The interesting point of the story is that is was possible given the
physics
> involved.
Either the boyscout knew enough atomic physics to build the reactor, or the
author did.
- Next message: Archimedes Plutonium: "Re: stunning news: Immunity from MadCow Disease; the model of Manufacturing Sites gone Awry is more accurate than Prusiner Model"
- Previous message: Mohammed Farooq: "Re: NITROGEN'S oxidation number in N2O"
- In reply to: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: Radioactive boyscout--Is it a literary hoax?"
- Next in thread: dave e: "Re: Radioactive boyscout--Is it a literary hoax?"
- Reply: dave e: "Re: Radioactive boyscout--Is it a literary hoax?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]