Re: Google SCHOLAR!

From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 12/15/04 

Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:44:13 -0800

Richard Schultz wrote:
>
> In article <41BF3E84.25E8F607@hate.spam.net>, Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> : An edited version of qz.pdf, below, was accepted for publication
> : pending Referee review.
>
> What is *that* supposed to mean? In the real world, one submits a paper
> to a journal (note that the journal to which the paper was submitted is
> not actually named anywhere). The editor then sends the manuscript to
> referees for review, and decides whether or not to publish it (or to
> publish it after revision) based on the recommendation of the referees.
>
> If it has not yet been reviewed, then it is not "accepted for publication"
> if it was actually sent to a refereed journal. Unless your preprint
> *is* the revised version, although it's generally considered proper practice
> to alert people of that fact.
[snip further critic troll crap]

Gee, Schultz, weren't you the one who said it would never be accepted
by a journal for consideration? You posted a big long rambling e-mail
punctiliously detailing all its shortcomings.

   1) Schwartz never answers my critic troll ravings!
   2) Schwartz has no right to answer my critic troll ravings!
   3) When Uncle Al smells lutafisk on 10 December 2007, he'll think
of you, Schultz.

> Dear Dr. Schwartz,
>
> The editors acknowledge receipt of the above manuscript on [snip] 2004
> and are considering it for possible publication as a regular article
> in [snip].

The e-mail then proceeds with Referee and other stuff. Pookie pookie
critic troll Schultz. 

-- 
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf