Re: How many main religious Festivities are there?

From: Tom Potter (tdp_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 12/18/04 

Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 22:31:03 +0800

"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:oHOwd.2380$RH4.1905@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
> news:41C39DBC.94ACD66E@hate.spam.net...
> > hanson wrote:

> After looking at your "religion vs. ***" website I checked your
> ref to Eotvoes. http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm
> Under the "Introduction" in the equations for mass = sqrt(p_x...
> I'd recommend for your to put in ".. wherein 'p' stands for...."
>
> Not to rain on your parade, Al, and on the inordinate time you
> have put into your endeavor in the hope that it may or may not
> shake the foundations of physics, I fear that even with a clear
> earthshaking outcome, all the theories will be preserved simply
> by redefining the concept/nature of mass. BUT, such a need for
> redefining mass would probably be THE profound & important
> payoff. Practical and technological consequences of a change at such
> a fundamental level would be indeed and truly revolutionary.

I see that hanson has not read my physics tutorial.

However I am pleased that he finds my definition of mass:
"THE profound & important payoff.
Practical and technological consequences of a change at such
a fundamental level would be indeed and truly revolutionary."

As I demonstrate in my tutorial,
 mass is expressed most fundamentally as a time.

time(mass) = mass * G / C^3

And that time in turn,
is expressed most fundamentally as:

time(X) = cycles(standard cross-correlated events) / cycles(X)

As can be seen,
ALL physical properties are most fundamentally
defined in terms of cycle counts
of some source of events,
said source being
the most convenient repetitive source events,
with a useable auto-correlation. 

--
Tom Potter     http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp