Re: What is the exact value of a mole?
dgenglish_at_hotmail.com
Date: 12/28/04
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Battery Explosion"
- Previous message: farooq_w_at_hotmail.com: "Re: mineral,ore,rock,metal"
- In reply to: Richard Schultz: "Re: What is the exact value of a mole?"
- Next in thread: Richard Schultz: "Re: What is the exact value of a mole?"
- Reply: Richard Schultz: "Re: What is the exact value of a mole?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Dec 2004 04:45:44 -0800
10.0 +/- 0.2 and 9.9 +/- 0.3 as independent measures of the same
value are arguable consistent results. But they aren't identical
results. 9.9 +/- 0.3 sets a different lower bound for the
statistically probable true value of this measurement. If seven other
labs independently determine the measured value to be 9.4 +/- 0.3, this
set of results is consistent with the second result (9.9 +/- 0.3) but
not the first (10.0 +/- 0.2). In this situation, one would have reason
to question whether the first result (10.0 +/- 0.2) was in error.
Dave
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Battery Explosion"
- Previous message: farooq_w_at_hotmail.com: "Re: mineral,ore,rock,metal"
- In reply to: Richard Schultz: "Re: What is the exact value of a mole?"
- Next in thread: Richard Schultz: "Re: What is the exact value of a mole?"
- Reply: Richard Schultz: "Re: What is the exact value of a mole?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]