Re: Undergrad chemistry college choice
From: William Penrose (wrp0143_at_comcast.com)
Date: 01/15/05
- Next message: William Penrose: "Re: Undergrad chemistry college choice"
- Previous message: farooq_w_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Undergrad chemistry college choice"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Undergrad chemistry college choice"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Undergrad chemistry college choice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:11:46 -0700
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:38:22 +0000 (UTC),
glhansen@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen) wrote:
>So it's chemistry, too? I've spent the last year learning about the
>employability of physicists. And I still read articles that say we must
>reverse the declining enrollment in physics classes, but never critically
>examining whether that does the students any good.
It's like the tobacco companies whining about people stopping smoking.
The University product is trained scientists. When the need for
scientists dries up, the schools still strive to maintain the illusion
of great market demand to keep their departments open. The message is
getting through anyway.
Bill Penrose
- Next message: William Penrose: "Re: Undergrad chemistry college choice"
- Previous message: farooq_w_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Undergrad chemistry college choice"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Undergrad chemistry college choice"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Undergrad chemistry college choice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]