Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions
From: Richard Tobin (richard_at_cogsci.ed.ac.uk)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Richard Tobin: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Previous message: wsb: "Re: h2o2 35% food ???"
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Jan 2005 23:04:00 GMT
In article <sMaLd.9425$xt.5229@fed1read07>,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote:
>In general, the nucleus doesn't "fly apart" because a neutron strikes it.
>In general, the nucleus does in fact *bind* the neutron, and then decay
>based on the expected kinetics of a nucleus with that many neutrons.
Thanks for clarifying that.
-- Richard
- Next message: Richard Tobin: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Previous message: wsb: "Re: h2o2 35% food ???"
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|