Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions
From: Marshall Dudley (mdudley_at_king-cart.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: Allan Adler: "Re: Yet another undergrad question"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Famous Scientists Who Died In The Holocaust"
- In reply to: Richard Tobin: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:35:46 -0500
Richard Tobin wrote:
> In article <41FE477D.D727CC5E@king-cart.com>,
> Marshall Dudley <mdudley@king-cart.com> wrote:
>
> >Mass and energy are the same thing, just two forms. Mass can be thought
> >of as condensed energy.
>
> Isn't it more accurate to say that *matter* is condensed energy? Doesn't
> even "uncondensed" energy have mass?
>
> -- Richard
Yessir, you are correct. Matter is condensed energy, mass contains matter
and energy. A brain slip on my part.
Marshall
- Next message: Allan Adler: "Re: Yet another undergrad question"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Famous Scientists Who Died In The Holocaust"
- In reply to: Richard Tobin: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
