Superconductivity related to Fusion; Fusion Barrier Principle

From: Archimedes Plutonium (a_plutonium_at_iw.net)
Date: 02/09/05 

Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:38:31 -0600

The Fusion Barrier Principle FBP says that control of a fusion device
interfers with its energy output so much that the maximum limit is 2/3
breakeven. For example: the Sun is a controlled device but its energy
output is less than 20%. A supernova on the other hand surpasses
breakeven but then again it loses control of itself and explodes. A
hydrogen bomb is an example of fusion energy exceeding breakeven but it
no longer is "controllable".

When we insist on a device that controls fusion (not explode) and
simultaneously insist on the device to surpass breakeven is where the
FBP enters the picture. FBP says such a devise is impossible and that a
maximum device of simultaneous Control and Breakeven has the upper limit
of 2/3 Breakeven. After ITER is built and tested, it will fail every
time it tries to surpass 2/3 Breakeven.

Proof of FBP: The proof centers on a mathematical geometry proof well
known to even bright High School students. It is the proof that a
cylinder enclosed in sphere can reach a maximum of only 2/3 volume or
2/3 surface area. For FBP the cylinder and sphere are 2 Maxwell
Equations of Coulombs law and Faradays law. Faradays law enters fusion
in that the tokamak is a Faraday racetrack or speedtrack of Control.
Coulombs law enters the picture in that the hydrogen nuclei repulse a
attempted fusing other nuclei. So we have an attempt at enclosing a
cylinder inside a sphere and which modern day scientists are trying to
get a larger volume than 2/3 or a larger surface area than 2/3.
Impossible!!!

But let me relate Superconductivity to FBP. When fusion does work, it
explodes. That is because fusion involves BEC-- Bose Einstein
Condensation. It is a quantum phenomenon that takes place everywhere
inside the medium within nanoseconds or microseconds. So BEC is involved
in Superconductivity.

So the question is what acts as a cylinder and sphere enclosing in
Superconductivity?

The empirical-parameters of Fusion were clearly seen by JET when it
reached a maximum of 64% breakeven and then was dismantled. The
empirical-parameters of Superconductivity are the recent achievements of
125K in a ceramic superconductor. The 2/3 breakeven is 67% breakeven yet
JET reached only 64% breakeven. In superconductivity, 100K is 1/3 of the
K temperature of 300K which is in the range of "room temperature".
Trouble here is that the marker of "room temperature" is not well
defined.

If BEC is involved in both fusion and superconductivity then they are
both related. And the relationship is that of inverses or reverses of
one another. Fusion would have a maximum control breakeven of 2/3 and
Superconductivity would have a maximum T_c of somewhere around 125 to
130K.

That leaves the pertinent question of what acts as spheres and cylinders
enclosing in superconductivity? The answer is remarkably simple in that
superconductors are the push and pull of electrons via electronegativity
and electropositivity. We see the fluorine atom and cesium atom as the
most electronegative and electropositive of all the atoms and the most
push and pull of electrons of all the atoms. So electronegativity and
electropositivity are the cylinder and spheres. A push is a cylinder and
a pull is a sphere.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Relevant Pages