specialness of 390 degree Kelvin; Meissner Effect
From: Archimedes Plutonium (a_plutonium_at_iw.net)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: Earthboundjeff: "re:Chemistry Experts"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Is this acceptable Chemical English?"
- Next in thread: Archimedes Plutonium: "a report from Liverpool Univ. Re: specialness of 390 degree Kelvin; Meissner Effect"
- Reply: Archimedes Plutonium: "a report from Liverpool Univ. Re: specialness of 390 degree Kelvin; Meissner Effect"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:45:46 -0600
In fusion physics the special number of 2/3 begot from enclosing
cylinder in sphere where upper limit is 2/3 per volume or per surface
area. Eventually leads to the proof that fusion has an upper limit of
2/3 Breakeven and is impossible to surpass 2/3 Breakeven because
Faraday's Law is the cylinder and Coulomb Law is the sphere.
So I need to link fusion physics with superconductivity with this 2/3
upper limit because Faradays Law and Coulomb Law are at the heart of
superconductivity.
The Kelvin temperature scale of 0 out to 130K where the highest known Tc
currently exists on out to 390 degrees Kelvin. For 130K is 1/3 from 390K
or starting from 390K then 130K is 2/3.
So is there anything special about 390K? Or the vicinity of 390K
temperature concerning magnetism. It maybe that the upper limit of Tc is
not 130K but say perhaps 140K and then I would focus on the specialness
of 420 degrees Kelvin and not 390K.
I remember a long time ago seeing demonstrations on magnetism and where
a magnet stuck to wires and heated and the magnet loses its hold.
Of course it needs to be proven and not assumed that the Meissner Effect
is a necessary and sufficient condition for superconductivity. Most
physicists assume necessary and sufficient. I am not convinced and
suspect that the Meissner Effect shows up in most superconduction but
not all superconduction. But I do know that the Meissner Effect is a
magnetic phenomenon and electricity is both electric current and
magnetism.
So, is this temperature of around 390 degrees Kelvin have anything
special regards to magnetism? Can we say that no magnetism exists at 390
degrees Kelvin? And if not 390 degrees Kelvin at what Kelvin.
I can say for certain that Superconductivity has both Faradays Law and
Coulomb Law and thus Superconductivity has both the cylinder enclosing
sphere upper limit of 2/3. And so, if this 390K is special to magnetism
in all materials then the implications are that 130K which is 2/3 from
390K is the upper limit for superconductor temperature.
I had a brief search on the Internet to see if 390Kelvin is some sort of
physics temperature limit to magnetism but had no luck.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
- Next message: Earthboundjeff: "re:Chemistry Experts"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Is this acceptable Chemical English?"
- Next in thread: Archimedes Plutonium: "a report from Liverpool Univ. Re: specialness of 390 degree Kelvin; Meissner Effect"
- Reply: Archimedes Plutonium: "a report from Liverpool Univ. Re: specialness of 390 degree Kelvin; Meissner Effect"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|