Re: Lewis and Bronsted-Lowry base
- From: fkasner <fkasner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:16:43 GMT
Angelo wrote:
Lloyd Parker wrote:
In article <sVhve.9413$hK3.7415@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "John Doe III" <john_doeIII@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I guess your reasoning about the NO3(-) is right, NO3(-) can accept a proton to form HNO3 i.e. a Bronsted-Lowry base which is equiavlent to saying it is donating a pair of electrons to H(+), hence a Lewis base. The question is ambiguous.
Techically spesking I don't see that ambiguity.
Thank you so much. I guess the author overlooked the fact that NO3- is a lewis base and a bronsted-Lowry base albeit a very weak one.
It is not a Bronstead base.
Why? (surely not based on Broensted-Lowry definition)
It has no proton-accepting ability. HNO3 does not exist -- nitric acid is 100% ionized in water.
I'd say that HNO3 (in water) does exists, although its concentration is too low, and so not measurably detectable. IIRC K_a(HNO3) has been estimated to be less than 10^2.
Best regars, Angelo
If I remember correctly, T. F. Young and A. A. Krawetz got (via Raman spectroscopy) a concentration (not activity) based Ka of about 60. Still makes it a very strong acid. HClO_4 is about 150 or so.
FK
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lewis and Bronsted-Lowry base
- From: Angelo
- Re: Lewis and Bronsted-Lowry base
- References:
- Re: Lewis and Bronsted-Lowry base
- From: Angelo
- Re: Lewis and Bronsted-Lowry base
- Prev by Date: Re: "A single atom can undergo only one transition at a time"
- Next by Date: Could this be true?
- Previous by thread: Re: Lewis and Bronsted-Lowry base
- Next by thread: Re: Lewis and Bronsted-Lowry base
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading