Re: Could this be true?
- From: "Dr_Dickie" <Dr_Dicke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:38:08 -0400
<michalchik@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1121118201.769780.290830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.counterpunch.com/gardner07022005.html
>
> Pot Shots
> Study: Smoking Marijuana Does Not Cause Lung Cancer
> By FRED GARDNER
>
>
> Marijuana smoking -"even heavy longterm use"- does not cause cancer of
> the lung, upper airwaves, or esophagus, Donald Tashkin reported at this
> year's meeting of the International Cannabinoid Research Society.
> Snip>
> * * *
>
Sort of irrelevant isn't it. I mean, yes smoking cigarettes elevates your
chances of lung cancer; however, that is not really the most pressing reason
to quit smoking. Emphysema, CHD, elevated blood pressure, stroke, etc are
more likely to result.
--
Dr. Dickie
Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
Poking kooks with a pointy stick.
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries,
is not 'Eureka!' ('I found it!'), but rather 'hmm....that's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
.
- References:
- Could this be true?
- From: michalchik
- Could this be true?
- Prev by Date: Re: "A single atom can undergo only one transition at a time"
- Next by Date: Re: Lewis and Bronsted-Lowry base
- Previous by thread: Re: Could this be true?
- Index(es):