Re: Acceptable temp for rapid charging NiMH cells?

You know what I mean.

On Sat, 27 May 2006 18:33:18 +0100, Jax wrote:

Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 18:33:18 +0100
From: Alex Coleman <no@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <Xns97D0BCC09B93571F3M4@xxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: sci.chem
Organization: Unknown
Path: emma.aioe.org!eleonora.aioe.org!aioe.org!
news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.
com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01
!news.shared-secrets.com!not-for-mail
References: <Xns97CE9367F9F62628D1@xxxxxxxxx>
<e59s51$br2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Acceptable temp for
rapid charging NiMH cells? User-Agent: Xnews/2005.10.18
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx X-No-Archive: yes Xref:
emma.aioe.org sci.chem:5516 MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

That's right Paul. And it was done delibrately because all four were
relevant. You see if I multipost (send each group a separate posting)
then they get different message IDs.

If they have different message IDs then then a newsreader can not
squelch out the posting in the other three groups once the newsreader
has seen it in one group because there is no common message ID.

You sound like a nice boy so I will be good enough to refer you to the
Good Net-keeping Seal of Approval for newsreaders (Google is your best
friend) which specifies four crossposts as the acceptable max.

Thank you for drawing attention to good practice.

I wish more people realized it just as you do. Well done, m'boy.

http://www.faqs.org/faq-maintainers/mail-archive/1997/Feb/0004.html


HERETICS IV. Mr. Bernard Shaw. By Gilbert K. Chesterton

In the glad old days, before the rise of modern morbidities, when genial old
Ibsen filled the world with wholesome joy, and the kindly tales of the
forgotten Emile Zola kept our firesides merry and pure, it used to be thought
a disadvantage to be misunderstood. It may be doubted whether it is always or
even generally a disadvantage. The man who is misunderstood has always this
advantage over his enemies, that they do not know his weak point or his plan
of campaign.

HERETICS IV. Mr. Bernard Shaw. By Gilbert K. Chesterton

In the glad old days, before the rise of modern morbidities, when genial old
Ibsen filled the world with wholesome joy, and the kindly tales of the
forgotten Emile Zola kept our firesides merry and pure, it used to be thought
a disadvantage to be misunderstood. It may be doubted whether it is always or
even generally a disadvantage. The man who is misunderstood has always this
advantage over his enemies, that they do not know his weak point or his plan
of campaign.

HERETICS IV. Mr. Bernard Shaw. By Gilbert K. Chesterton

In the glad old days, before the rise of modern morbidities, when genial old
Ibsen filled the world with wholesome joy, and the kindly tales of the
forgotten Emile Zola kept our firesides merry and pure, it used to be thought
a disadvantage to be misunderstood. It may be doubted whether it is always or
even generally a disadvantage. The man who is misunderstood has always this
advantage over his enemies, that they do not know his weak point or his plan
of campaign.

--

.

Relevant Pages