Re: Free Energy
- From: Salmon Egg <salmonegg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:31:38 GMT
On 8/20/06 5:38 AM, in article 4kr3dlFdgfhuU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Dirk Bruere
at NeoPax" <dirk.bruere@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charles wrote:
http://www.gizmag.com/go/6031/
Testing such a claim is simple.
'Close the loop' - that is, start up the machine and then remove its
power source taking only power from its output. Any *significant* excess
siphoned off over a period of hours should be sufficient to prove the
claim. Allow the scientists to check the machine for hidden batteries or
inductively couple power.
Every claim of 'free energy' that I've come across fails to do this, for
very good reasons.
Dirk
If you can find a reliable and well funded bookie taking bets on both sides
of the issue, I am willing to put a considerable amount of money on the
line. I won't tell you which side I will take because I do not wish to lower
the odfs.
Bill
-- Ferme le Bush
.
- References:
- Re: Free Energy
- From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
- Re: Free Energy
- Prev by Date: Re: Liquid Explosives used aboard airliners
- Next by Date: Re: The Janet Table
- Previous by thread: Re: Free Energy
- Next by thread: Re: Free Energy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|