Re: help regarding modern technology
- From: "Bill Penrose" <penrose@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Aug 2006 13:30:56 -0700
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
Dear Bill Penrose:
"Bill Penrose" <penrose@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156307138.491625.260690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bill Penrose wrote:
I've worked with machines that routinely made
30-50% ozone by corona discharge,
That technology has never reached industry. New municipal ozone
generators are running around 12 wt%. Semiconductor ozone
generators are running just upwards of 20 wt%.
I rechecked my reference, which is rather old and out of print:
Horvath M., Bilitzky L., & Huttner J., "Ozone.", Elsevier 1985.
I'm not sure if there is a newer one, since I stopped working on ozone
in 1995.
Sure enough, according to them, ozone may explode above 18 mol% if
ignited by a spark. Spontaneous explosions happen between 38 and 44
mol%, but a metal surface may be needed to initiate the decomp. By
happenstance, our system was all glass and Kynar.
Whaddya know. Looks like we dodged a bullet when working with this
stuff. We had plans to ramp up the output for our client, too, but he
decided 30% (v/v) was enough. (I'm not sufficiently motivated to
convert from mol% to v/v.)
I once got a faceful of the stuff when the power failed and the hood
stopped. I was sick for a week with a sore throat and headache that
wouldn't quit.
Dangerous Bill
.
- References:
- help regarding modern technology
- From: iitaspirant2009
- Re: help regarding modern technology
- From: dlzc
- Re: help regarding modern technology
- From: Bill Penrose
- Re: help regarding modern technology
- From: Bill Penrose
- Re: help regarding modern technology
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- help regarding modern technology
- Prev by Date: Re: Disposing of sodium metal - burn it?
- Next by Date: Re: Disposing of sodium metal - burn it?
- Previous by thread: Re: help regarding modern technology
- Next by thread: Re: help regarding modern technology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|