Oxidation number
- From: roald.hanssen@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:45:02 -0700
The logic behind the oxidation number formalism for molecular
compounds, I thought, was to assign the more electronegative element
both electron pairs in a given bond. This works well for many
compounds, but with nitrogen triiodide, for example, shouldn't
nitrogen have oxidation number -3 (5 - 8), since nitrogen (3.04) on
the Pauling scale is more electronegative than iodine (2.66)?
Cheers,
Roald.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oxidation number
- From: Madalch
- Re: Oxidation number
- From: Bill Penrose
- Re: Oxidation number
- Prev by Date: Re: fluoroacetate hazard?
- Next by Date: Re: Oxidation number
- Previous by thread: fluoroacetate hazard?
- Next by thread: Re: Oxidation number
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|