Re: carbonic acid
- From: Mark Thorson <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:58:16 -0800
Salmon Egg wrote:
In article <47DC99F9.FD95E5F5@xxxxxxxxx>,
Mark Thorson <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Possibly, fused silica, not glass?
You are probably correct. But why do you not consider fused silica to be
a glass? How does it differ from a glass? True, it may not have soda or
lime to lower its softening temperature.
In the scientific sense it is a glass (as are
a number of materials that do not contain silica),
but in industry a distinction is made between
glass and fused silica.
The additives have a huge impact on its properties.
For example, you can blow shapes in glass
that would be impossible in fused silica.
You can heat a piece of silica to red heat,
then plunge it into water without it cracking.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Salmon Egg
- Re: carbonic acid
- References:
- carbonic acid
- From: Allan Adler
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Bill Penrose
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Allan Adler
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Ian Gay
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Fred Kasner
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Salmon Egg
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Mark Thorson
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Salmon Egg
- carbonic acid
- Prev by Date: Re: carbonic acid
- Next by Date: Netiquette brother, Google loves you
- Previous by thread: Re: carbonic acid
- Next by thread: Re: carbonic acid
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|