Re: carbonic acid
- From: Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:16:01 GMT
In article <47DD7BD7.A9E36945@xxxxxxxxx>,
Mark Thorson <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the scientific sense it is a glass (as are
a number of materials that do not contain silica),
but in industry a distinction is made between
glass and fused silica.
The additives have a huge impact on its properties.
For example, you can blow shapes in glass
that would be impossible in fused silica.
You can heat a piece of silica to red heat,
then plunge it into water without it cracking.
How much of the difficulty with quartz blowing arises from its high
working temperature as opposed to other problems? Certainly fused silica
tubes are formed into helical flashtubes. For all I know, simple shapes
such as flasks can be blown.
In other words is the problem with fusing silica the same as with fusing
hydrogen nuclei? It is difficult to maintain a high temperature.
Bill
.
- References:
- carbonic acid
- From: Allan Adler
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Bill Penrose
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Allan Adler
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Ian Gay
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Fred Kasner
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Salmon Egg
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Mark Thorson
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Salmon Egg
- Re: carbonic acid
- From: Mark Thorson
- carbonic acid
- Prev by Date: Re: carbonic acid
- Next by Date: Re: carbonic acid
- Previous by thread: Re: carbonic acid
- Next by thread: Re: carbonic acid
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|