Re: chemical equilibrium
On Mar 17, 3:14 pm, b201b402cd2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Consider the reaction:
A -> B + C
If the reactor already has substantial B and C in it, the reaction
will not proceed as far to the right as it would without B and C (Le
Chatelier).
What if the reactor has substantial C, but no B in it? Will the
reaction still proceed as though it had been devoid if both B and C?
B201B402CD21C3
You'd have to calculate Q and compare it to K.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Chocolate Chip Cookies
... Two calcium carbonate-encapsulated avian albumen-coated protein ... mixture in reactor #1. ... add ingredient nine and ten ... exothermic reaction. ...
(uk.people.support.depression) - Re: OT: New Climate Pact!
... as in 'reaction in a test tube for a vanishingly small ... >time' and test tube as in 'sodding great machine'. ... >Mike Pentz joined a team working on fusion reaction not long after the ... Indeed, JET first fired up their reactor 22 years ago, and it has been used ...
(uk.comp.sys.mac) - Re: Science journalism, SciAm, and Chez whatever.
... Scientific American in particular. ... The whole reaction takes less than 50 milliseconds. ... Dreyer also notes that their reactor could work ... I think I could make a reactor where no more carbon comes out of the ...
(talk.origins) - Re: New star wars moivie
... Don't forget Lando. ... Lando shot the reactor directly, ... a chain reaction that eventually blew the reactor. ... I thought that hitting the reactor was what started the chain reaction ...
(alt.fan.starwars) - Re: chemical equilibrium
... What if the reactor has substantial C, ... reaction still proceed as though it had been devoid if both B and C? ... Ron Jones ... and I'm not certain about the universe. ...
(sci.chem) |
|
