Re: chemical equilibrium
- From: Marvin <physchem@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:08:42 GMT
Ron Jones wrote:
b201b402cd21c3@xxxxxxxxx wrote:Consider the reaction:
A -> B + C
If the reactor already has substantial B and C in it, the reaction
will not proceed as far to the right as it would without B and C (Le
Chatelier).
What if the reactor has substantial C, but no B in it? Will the
reaction still proceed as though it had been devoid if both B and C?
It's too dependant on the rate constants to generalize.
A -> B + C can also be the equation for a firework / runaway reaction - the presence of extra C will slow the reaction (by absorbing heat and reducing the temperature rise), but it's still going to go to completion.
The heading on the original post was "chemical equilibrium". The question was evidently about an equilibrium reaction.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: chemical equilibrium
- From: Bruce Sinclair
- Re: chemical equilibrium
- From: Ron Jones
- Re: chemical equilibrium
- References:
- Re: chemical equilibrium
- From: Ron Jones
- Re: chemical equilibrium
- Prev by Date: Re: elementary steps of isomerisation
- Next by Date: Re: How to thin nail varnish at home
- Previous by thread: Re: chemical equilibrium
- Next by thread: Re: chemical equilibrium
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|